CollegeTimes - Latest Comments in Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

Re: Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

Answer — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:57:15 -0000

Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening
--------------------------------------
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TABOO! HAVE YOU GOT IT????????????????
--------------------------------------

Re: Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

What? — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:36:02 -0000

I have a naked picture of me when i was 5.... who wants to see it?

Re: Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

Ren — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:52:01 -0000

Well, I'm glad I'm not the only one who found that writing horrible. It's also high level and doesn't even present a definition of child porn. Who is a child? 5 year olds for sure, but what about 15? Or 17?

Your arguments are vague and lack a decent structure.

Re: Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

Hmmm — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:58:39 -0000

I concur. With such poor execution of the English language and failure to proofread, one has to wonder the validity of such claims.

Re: Child Pornography: Taboo or Broadening

just wow — Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:11:08 -0000

Other than the fact that Child Pornography is an evil and exploitative practice, your writing is barely readable. You use words with too many syllables, often times when simpler words would work. Your sentence structure and grammar is abysmal, and you create confusing syntax in many places. Your use of the first person in combination with your butchery of the English language makes me question the validity of any statements or pronouncements made, as this piece was obviously written by someone who is intelligent but uneducated and therefore invalidates your position. Essentially, you made child porn seem OK by virtue of being a horrible writer.